Tony Chapman, CEO of Capital C, says Canada is at sea when it comes to innovation and needs a plan for the future. Click here to see him featured in the Globe and Mail's Leading Thinkers series - discussing issues needing new ideas now.
« Digital Digs 02/05/11 | Main | Digital Digs 16/05/11 »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c97f753ef014e88390af8970d
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Is Canada a "rudderless" pumper of oil?:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Rudderless is fairly sharp terminology, I personally think most Canadian brands are doing great:
TD Bank, Lululemon, Blackberry, etc., have all made a strong switch from the "I am Canadian" mantra over to international stardom and have truly become hub brands with many imitators.
On the flip-side are the failing "international" Canadian brands such as Molson, Tim Horton's, Canadian Tire, Labatt.
My opinion is they're amazing brands, but extremist. They're not going to innovate because they push the "I am Canadian" mantra too far. Would Home Depot have a location in every US-style mega mall in Canada if it was named USA Depot while rocking a big Stars & Stripes flag out front? Why is it that Canadian brands feel a need to fall back to red colour schemes plastered with maple leaves? Wouldn't our brands be best served if positioned to evoke quality instead of blind loyalty? TD, LL, and BB have all done it. I don't drink Molson Canadian because I am Canadian, it's borderline insulting that they feel I'd be so easily swayed, just make a good beer and I'll drink it.
Posted by: Scott Luscombe | June 15, 2011 at 03:01 PM